Why SDAC 5.0 works too slowly than SDAC 4.80&
-
Alexander_73
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Mon 24 Mar 2008 13:22
Why SDAC 5.0 works too slowly than SDAC 4.80&
I have installed SDAC 5.0 on RAD Studio 2007.
I build and run the program, I execute from it complex query. Time of performance - 15 seconds. Then I delete SDAC 5.0 and install 4.80. I build and run the program, I execute the same query. Time of performance - 3 seconds. Time of performance of the same query in MS SQL Server Management Studio - 2 seconds.
What has changed, any adjustments because of which so productivity has fallen off? At us greater problems with our system, executing hundred thousand queries when we update it up to SDAC 5.0.
I build and run the program, I execute from it complex query. Time of performance - 15 seconds. Then I delete SDAC 5.0 and install 4.80. I build and run the program, I execute the same query. Time of performance - 3 seconds. Time of performance of the same query in MS SQL Server Management Studio - 2 seconds.
What has changed, any adjustments because of which so productivity has fallen off? At us greater problems with our system, executing hundred thousand queries when we update it up to SDAC 5.0.
-
AndreyZ
-
Alexander_73
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Mon 24 Mar 2008 13:22
If a pre-defaults between SDAC versions have not changed, I am sure. I only uninstall one version, install other version, open RAD Studio and run a program. I pay your attention that falling of productivity occurs in all my programs as soon as they gather after installation SDAC 5. MS SQL Server 2008.AndreyZ wrote:Hello,
We didn't change anything that could influence query performance. Please, make sure that you are using the same options for all tests.
I just noticed slow down issue with newer version..
There's definately problem with newer version.
As far I can tell you,
#1. using * in select clause make it slow especially when table has lot of fields..
#2. using individual field names in select clause make it very slow when there's lot of fields...
There's definately problem with newer version.
As far I can tell you,
#1. using * in select clause make it slow especially when table has lot of fields..
#2. using individual field names in select clause make it very slow when there's lot of fields...
-
AndreyZ
-
Alexander_73
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Mon 24 Mar 2008 13:22
-
AndreyZ
-
Alexander_73
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Mon 24 Mar 2008 13:22
It is a joke? The query uses a complex of tens tables, table-valued and scalar-valued functions. To recreate this structure, some weeks of work are necessary. I can open on our server for you a test login and send two test programs connected to them, builded under different versions of SDAC.AndreyZ wrote:I still could not reproduce the problem. I need the table structure you are using to help you. Please, send it to andreyz*devart*com.
-
AndreyZ
I have performed a lot of tests and none of them showed performance decreasing. To help you I need the scripts to create your tables and the text of the query that you are performing. I don't need the data that is stored in this tables, only the tables structure. You can extract these scripts from SQL Server Management Studio to files so that I am able to recreate your database structure. Please, send the scripts and text of the query to andreyz*devart*com. The results of testing may be incorrect if I work with your database through the network.