SDAC abilities

Discussion of open issues, suggestions and bugs regarding SDAC (SQL Server Data Access Components) for Delphi, C++Builder, Lazarus (and FPC)
Post Reply
trayal
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed 01 Jun 2005 09:31

SDAC abilities

Post by trayal » Wed 01 Jun 2005 12:29

I have 2 questions.

1) Program in folder SDAC\Demos\Performance.
I run "Fetch Test" between SDAC and dbExpress. By result, dbExpress is more faster, than SDAC, though SDAC is special components to access to MSSQL! Why?

2) From MSDN:
SQLOLEDB implements the provider-specific IRowsetFastLoad interface to expose support for Microsoft® SQL Server™ 2000 bulk copy from a consumer to a SQL Server 2000 table
How this interface implements in SDAC?
Can I do somehow bulk-copy operations, using SDAC?

Ikar
Posts: 1693
Joined: Thu 28 Oct 2004 13:56

Post by Ikar » Thu 02 Jun 2005 11:04

> 1) Program in folder SDAC\Demos\Performance.

DbExpress doesn't ask for interfaces related with update data. It allows to increase a little a speed of opening DataSet due to refuse from automat generating UpdateSQL.

> 2) Can I do somehow bulk-copy operations, using SDAC?

SDAC doesn't provide this functionality.

trayal
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed 01 Jun 2005 09:31

Post by trayal » Thu 02 Jun 2005 12:19

Thanks.
DbExpress doesn't ask ...
Can I disable "ask for interfaces related with update data"?

Ikar
Posts: 1693
Joined: Thu 28 Oct 2004 13:56

Post by Ikar » Fri 03 Jun 2005 07:48

Now it is unlikely possible, but we will consider adding this feature at the next versions.

However, does it make sense insignificant performance increase to refuse from using automatic generating queries for Post and RefreshRecord?

trayal
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed 01 Jun 2005 09:31

Post by trayal » Fri 03 Jun 2005 08:30

In some cases, I not need automatic generating queries, but I will use any, even insignificant, possibility to performance increase.

Sorry for my english :)

trayal
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed 01 Jun 2005 09:31

Post by trayal » Sat 04 Jun 2005 07:00

Sorry.
Not "I will use": I want use any, even insignificant, possibility to performance increase

Ikar
Posts: 1693
Joined: Thu 28 Oct 2004 13:56

Post by Ikar » Mon 06 Jun 2005 14:08

We'll consider this ides. Probably, proper changes will be available by the beginning of the next month.

Post Reply