UniDAC v LiteDAC

Discussion of open issues, suggestions and bugs regarding UniDAC (Universal Data Access Components) for Delphi, C++Builder, Lazarus (and FPC)
Post Reply
NoComprende
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue 09 Jan 2007 13:44

UniDAC v LiteDAC

Post by NoComprende » Sun 12 Jul 2015 15:07

Would I get the same speed using UniDAC to access SQLite tables/queries that I would using LiteDAC or is there a price to pay? For the sake of argument assume I'm accessing nothing but SQLite databases.
Top
AlexP
Devart Team
Posts: 5530
Joined: Tue 10 Aug 2010 11:35

Re: UniDAC v LiteDAC

Post by AlexP » Mon 13 Jul 2015 07:39

Hello,

UniDAC providers are based on basic classes of the other Data Access Components (LiteDAC in particular), therefore UniDAC and LiteDAC performance is equal.
For the time being, the differences between UniDAC and LiteDAC are minimal, LiteDAC has a component that simplifies creating of and work with user functions, user collation, and LiteDAC has a more flexible backup engine
Top
NoComprende
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue 09 Jan 2007 13:44

Re: UniDAC v LiteDAC

Post by NoComprende » Mon 13 Jul 2015 08:17

Thanks Alex.
Top
AlexP
Devart Team
Posts: 5530
Joined: Tue 10 Aug 2010 11:35

Re: UniDAC v LiteDAC

Post by AlexP » Mon 13 Jul 2015 08:36

If you have any other questions, feel free to contact us.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Universal Data Access Components”