transactions or TUniLoader - which is faster
Posted: Thu 12 Dec 2013 15:54
I am away from my desk so can't do any experimenst, but I just wondered whether moving from StartTransaction/Append/Post/Commit to using a TUniLoader is likely to make any difference to the speed at which I load data into a database.
I have a few million records to insert and time is of the essense. Is either one of these likely to be faster than the other, or are they basically the same operation?
I have a few million records to insert and time is of the essense. Is either one of these likely to be faster than the other, or are they basically the same operation?