Page 2 of 2
Re: Modifying a SP generates "This object requires rebuilding ..."
Posted: Thu 19 Apr 2018 15:02
by alexa
Thank you for the reply.
We will reconsider the existing behavior when developing the next product versions.
Re: Modifying a SP generates "This object requires rebuilding ..."
Posted: Sun 29 Jul 2018 22:15
by tiagobr
They are already in version 8.0.40 (21-Jun-2018) and the problem still exists !!! Why do you guys still sell software that does not work ???
The only thing that makes the software interesting is Debug but it does not work !!! Only works in version 7.3.148 !!!
I repeat ... it's a paid software !!!
You have to inform customers that the latest version that works is 7.3.148
Re: Modifying a SP generates "This object requires rebuilding ..."
Posted: Wed 01 Aug 2018 14:50
by alexa
Sorry for the delay on this.
We are planning to fix it by October this year.
Re: Modifying a SP generates "This object requires rebuilding ..."
Posted: Fri 12 Oct 2018 01:09
by tiagobr
alexa wrote: ↑Wed 01 Aug 2018 14:50
Sorry for the delay on this.
We are planning to fix it by October this year.
What day? It's October already...
Re: Modifying a SP generates "This object requires rebuilding ..."
Posted: Wed 31 Oct 2018 09:54
by PhilJenson
Is there an option to disable this message?
Re: Modifying a SP generates "This object requires rebuilding ..."
Posted: Thu 15 Nov 2018 09:51
by alexa
There is no an option for this.
Re: Modifying a SP generates "This object requires rebuilding ..."
Posted: Fri 18 Jan 2019 06:38
by pospanko
The problem still exists? It's annoying... Do you plan to fix this?
Re: Modifying a SP generates "This object requires rebuilding ..."
Posted: Fri 18 Jan 2019 13:21
by alexa
We are planning to add an option for this in version 8.2.
Re: Modifying a SP generates "This object requires rebuilding ..."
Posted: Mon 04 Mar 2019 09:23
by LanetteJoe
new updates has resolve the issue of dbforge with MySQL thanks guys keep it up
Re: Modifying a SP generates "This object requires rebuilding ..."
Posted: Thu 18 Apr 2019 12:09
by matneves
You're wrong, at 8.1.22 this scenario still existis.